In the world of biologics and large molecule therapeutics, knowing how much drug reaches target tissues—and how long it stays there—is mission-critical. That’s where pharmacokinetics (PK) and toxicokinetics (TK) come in: they connect exposure to effect and safety. But not all PK/TK services are created equal.
At Smithers, PK/TK isn’t just a checkbox. It’s a strategic pillar of their bioanalytical platform, crafted to accelerate data interpretation, reduce risk, and deliver clarity across a drug’s journey from discovery to post-market. This article explores how Smithers approaches PK/TK, what differentiates their offerings, and how sponsors (especially in biotech and mid-large pharma) can benefit most.
In both cases, the quality of data depends heavily on the robustness of analytical methods and sample handling. A weak PK/TK strategy can introduce errors, reduce confidence in model fitting, or even derail a regulatory submission.
From method transfer, development, and validation to sample analysis, Smithers provides end-to-end PK/TK workflows. Method work is essential, but the greatest value lies in sample analysis—where results translate into decisions that directly influence client projects and return on investment.
Smithers has molecular capabilities where needed. We support multiple ligand-binding assay technologies to meet varied molecule types (e.g. monoclonal antibodies, bispecifics, tri-specifics):
In April 2024, Smithers launched a Preclinical Generic PK Assay tailored to humanized mAb IgG molecules, which reduces development time for assay design and validation. This helps sponsors get PK concentration data more quickly without sacrificing sensitivity or regulatory rigor.
Smithers operates under GCLP, GLP, and CLIA standards in its labs. They also recently appointed a new CLIA Director, underscoring the emphasis on regulatory integrity.
Rather than treating PK/TK as a commoditized deliverable, Smithers positions itself as a scientific partner. Their method development efforts are customized, consultative, and designed to anticipate future challenges (e.g., transitions into immunogenicity or multiplexing).
To get maximum value—and avoid downstream surprises—sponsors should consider these criteria when choosing a CRO:
Biologic matrices (e.g. serum, plasma) may contain endogenous proteins or binding partners that confound quantification. Proper controls and normalization strategies are critical.
As a program moves from discovery to clinical, assay sensitivity, stability, and robustness must evolve. Establishing scalable calibrators and cross-validation from early to late stage is essential.
Detecting low concentrations near the lower limit demands an optimized signal-to-noise ratio and rigorous QC.
Sample shipping, freeze-thaw stability, biorepository design — these logistical details affect data reliability, especially for global studies.
Sponsors increasingly prefer bundling PK/TK, immunogenicity, biomarkers, etc., under one roof. That’s where program efficiencies potential lies (as your matrix discussions emphasized).
PK and TK are no longer “just numbers” in drug development. They’re strategic levers. In biologic programs, the power of your exposure data, the agility of your methods, and the reliability of your sample analysis all knit together to build not just a regulatory package, but a platform for confidence to meet client deliverables.
Smithers’ PK/TK platform is built around that principle. If you’re a biotech or pharma group launching new biologics, antibodies, bispecifics, tri-specifics or advanced therapies, partnering with a lab that treats PK/TK as a collaborative science (rather than a commodity) could make the difference between “data delivered” and “program advanced.”
Want to dive deeper into how Smithers would approach your specific molecule or timeline? We can help you shape those conversation points, too.