.png?ext=.png)
Smithers Unaccredited Auditing Services Tool Kit
Download the Smithers Quality Assessments Unaccredited Auditing Services Tool Kit to begin the process of organizational improvement.
Internal vs External ISO 9001 Audits: Key Differences and Insights
Quality management is not a one-time achievement; it is a continuous cycle of improvement and verification. For organizations implementing the ISO 9001:2015 standard, audits are the primary mechanism for ensuring that the Quality Management System (QMS) is functioning as intended. However, for those new to the standard, the distinction between the different types of audits can be confusing.
Understanding internal vs external ISO 9001 audits differences is critical for any business seeking to achieve and maintain certification. While both audits aim to verify compliance and drive improvement, they serve distinct purposes, are conducted by different parties, and have different consequences for the organization. This guide explores these key differences to help you prepare effectively for both.
What is an Internal Audit? (Clause 9.2)
An internal audit, often referred to as a "first-party" audit, is a self-assessment procedure. According to ISO 9001 Clause 9.2, organizations are required to conduct these audits at planned intervals. The primary goal is to determine if the QMS conforms to the organization’s own requirements and the requirements of the ISO 9001 standard.
Internal audits are essentially a health check for your business processes. They are designed to identify gaps, weaknesses, and non-conformities before they become larger issues.
Who Performs Internal Audits?
These audits are conducted by the organization's own staff or by hired consultants acting on behalf of the organization. The critical requirement is impartiality; auditors cannot audit their own work. For example, a quality manager might audit the sales department, while a production manager might audit the purchasing department.
The Focus of Internal Audits
The focus here is largely on improvement and readiness. Internal auditors look for evidence that processes are effective and that the QMS is being maintained. If a non-conformance is found, it is treated as an opportunity to implement corrective actions without the risk of losing certification. Effective internal auditing is the best preparation for the external audit process.
What is an External Audit?
An external audit, specifically a certification audit, is a "third-party" audit conducted by an independent Certification Body (CB) or Registrar. This is the official examination that determines whether an organization earns or retains its ISO 9001 certification.
External audits are governed by strict rules (such as ISO/IEC 17021-1) to ensure impartiality and competence. The auditor’s job is not to consult or offer advice on how to fix problems, but to objectively verify that the QMS complies with the standard.
The Stages of External Audits
The initial certification process is typically broken down into two parts:
- Stage 1 (Readiness Review): The auditor reviews documentation and evaluates the site to determine if the organization is ready for the full certification audit. They verify that the QMS has been designed correctly and that internal audits and management reviews have been conducted.
- Stage 2 (Certification Audit): The auditor evaluates the implementation and effectiveness of the management system. They look for evidence that the organization is actually doing what its documentation says it does.
Following initial certification, organizations undergo surveillance audits (typically annually) and a recertification audit every three years to ensure continued compliance.
Key Internal vs External ISO 9001 Audits Differences
To navigate the path to certification successfully, it is helpful to break down the internal vs external ISO 9001 audits differences across several specific categories: purpose, scope, frequency, and outcomes.
1. Purpose and Objectives
The most fundamental internal vs external ISO 9001 audits differences lie in their objectives. An internal audit is an internal management tool. Its purpose is to verify the effectiveness of the QMS, identify opportunities for improvement, and prepare the organization for external assessment. It provides top management with assurance that the system is working.
In contrast, the external audit is a compliance test. The objective is to provide assurance to customers and stakeholders that the organization’s QMS meets the international standard. The external auditor is verifying conformance to grant or maintain a certificate, not to consult on business improvements.
2. The Auditor’s Role
In an internal audit, the auditor is often a colleague or a consultant who acts as a partner in improvement. While they must remain objective, they often have deep knowledge of the company culture and specific challenges.
External auditors must remain completely independent. They cannot have any conflict of interest and cannot have consulted for the company within a specified period (typically two years). Their relationship with the organization is formal and evaluative.
3. Schedule and Flexibility
When examining internal vs external ISO 9001 audits differences, scheduling is a major factor. Internal audits are flexible. The organization determines the frequency based on the importance of the processes and the results of previous audits. If a specific department is having quality issues, the organization can schedule more frequent internal audits for that area.
External audits follow a rigid cycle set by accreditation rules. Surveillance audits must occur annually, and recertification must happen before the current certificate expires. The organization has less flexibility to move these dates without risking a lapse in certification.
4. Outcomes and Consequences
The stakes involved represent one of the most significant internal vs external ISO 9001 audits differences.
- Internal Audit Outcome: Findings lead to internal Corrective Action Requests (CARs). These are internal records used to fix processes. There is no penalty for finding a non-conformance internally; in fact, finding and fixing issues internally is a sign of a healthy QMS.
- External Audit Outcome: Findings can range from opportunities for improvement (OFIs) to Minor or Major Non-Conformities. A Major Non-Conformity during a Stage 2 audit can prevent certification. During surveillance audits, unaddressed Major Non-Conformities can lead to the suspension or withdrawal of the ISO 9001 certificate.
How the Audits Work Together
Despite the internal vs external ISO 9001 audits differences, the two functions are deeply interconnected. The internal audit is a mandatory input for the external audit.
During a Stage 1 or surveillance audit, the external auditor will specifically review the organization’s internal audit reports. They want to see that the organization is capable of policing itself. If an external auditor sees that internal audits are thorough, identify issues, and lead to effective corrective actions, they gain confidence in the management system. Conversely, if internal audits always report "zero findings" while the external auditor finds obvious issues, it suggests the internal audit program is ineffective.
Preparing for Success
Organizations that understand the internal vs external ISO 9001 audits differences are better positioned to utilize both tools effectively. Internal audits should be rigorous and honest to minimize the stress and risk associated with external audits. By treating the internal audit as a dress rehearsal, the external audit becomes a validation of hard work rather than a fearful event.
Ultimately, both audit types share a common goal: ensuring the organization delivers consistent quality to its customers through a robust, compliant, and ever-improving management system.
For tailored support and assurance in achieving audit excellence, request a quote today or contact us directly to discuss your organization's needs.
